Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint W110 dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.0 (2,301)·Very fair · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 30
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: neutral fair with yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 30
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Extra light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 30
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: neutral light with yellow undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light complexion with warm yellow undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: L3.25 - light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very fair with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same light coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: L2 - Light with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair complexion with warm yellow undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
30
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with cool rosy beige undertones
The closest shade to L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint W110 (Very fair · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Light 2, against L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint in W110. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeW110Closest shade matchLight 2How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#f5d5b3#f4d5b8Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 85/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F2.5NC, against L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint in W110. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeW110Closest overall alternativeF2.5NCHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%95#f5d5b3#efd2b3Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 93/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $5.01 more
