Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint N210 dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.0 (2,301)·Medium light · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to rich complexion with warm golden undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for medium skin with neutral rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium light, peach-beige undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: Medium to tan neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium dark with neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: very light cool skin with pink undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$8.99 less (53%)2.4 (5)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
30
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: fair or light skin tones with a neutral undertone
The closest shade to L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint N210 (Medium light · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
ILIA True Skin Serum Foundation in Salina SF5, against L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint in N210. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeN210Closest shade matchSalina SF5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#d4a582#d5a580Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 84/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F9.5NC, against L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint in N210. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeN210Closest overall alternativeF9.5NCHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%97#d4a582#d5a885Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 95/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $25.01 more
