Dazzleshadow Eye Shadow Stick Filthy Martini dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (730)·Green · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (48%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (69%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: Dark olive metallic with taupe shimmer/Sage green foil with champagne sparkle
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: an olive green with a walnut shift
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
28
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: emerald green to gold to teal
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Silver rather than green
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Silver rather than green · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (48%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: duochrome light green with pink reflects
Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Mixed Greens, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Eye Shadow Stick in Filthy Martini. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFilthy MartiniClosest matchMixed GreensHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%71#8a8a72#989171Close colourColour difference 4.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall81
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$17 less (59%)
Sephora
