Dazzleshadow Eye Shadow Stick Haku Haze dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (730)·Purple · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Plum rather than purple· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than purple · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: burgundy metallic with taupe shimmer/copper rose foil with shifts of pink and gold sparkle
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light purple with gold glitter
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than purple · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: brushed gold with silver shimmer
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than purple · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than purple · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Green rather than purple· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Green rather than purple · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: vibrant purple with silver, blue, violet and pink sparkle
Clinique Chubby Stick Eye Shadow Tint For Eyes in Lavish Lilac, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Eye Shadow Stick in Haku Haze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHaku HazeClosest shade matchLavish LilacHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%83#a6868f#a28a97Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall83
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall60
Longevity50%8012-hour wear8-hour wearClose8-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Lavender Slip, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Eye Shadow Stick in Haku Haze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHaku HazeClosest overall alternativeLavender SlipHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%81#a6868f#ab808dClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 88/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.