Dazzleshadow Eye Shadow Stick Subliminal Spark dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (730)·Silver · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Pink rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than silver· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than silver · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (14%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than silver· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than silver · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Nude rather than silver· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than silver · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Grey rather than silver· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than silver · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Jane Iredale ColorLuxe Eye Shadow Stick in Cameo, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Eye Shadow Stick in Subliminal Spark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSubliminal SparkClosest shade matchCameoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%93#cc9b8d#ca9d93Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 66/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Glitter Gaze 2-in-1 Shimmer Crayon & Liquid Eye Shadow in Silky Taupe, against MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Eye Shadow Stick in Subliminal Spark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSubliminal SparkClosest overall alternativeSilky TaupeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour60%91#cc9b8d#cea096Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 78/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
34 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.