Aqua Resist Smoky Eyeshadow Stick 04 Jungle dupes and alternatives Make Up For Ever
4.2 (261)·Green · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Grey rather than green · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Dark olive metallic with taupe shimmer/Sage green foil with champagne sparkle
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
36
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: warm green metallic with gold microglitter
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than green· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than green · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than green· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than green · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than green· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than green · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: metallic bronze shade packed with multidimensional sparkle & a shimmer finish
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: an olive green with a walnut shift
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than green
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than green · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (14%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Black rather than green
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Black rather than green · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than green · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than green
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than green · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (48%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than green
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than green · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.01 less (52%)4.4 (1,922)
Metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Revlon Glimmer Eyeshadow Multi-Stick in Tini Time, against Make Up For Ever Aqua Resist Smoky Eyeshadow Stick in 04 Jungle. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade04 JungleClosest shade matchTini TimeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%92#72633f#73603cVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Camo Trench, against Make Up For Ever Aqua Resist Smoky Eyeshadow Stick in 04 Jungle. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade04 JungleClosest overall alternativeCamo TrenchHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%65#72633f#6a5f4bSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Overall match 85/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.