Aqua Resist Smoky Eyeshadow Stick 14 Solar dupes and alternatives Make Up For Ever
4.2 (261)·Golden · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
67
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: metallic amber gold with sparkling reflects
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· 14-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · 14-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
26
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
67
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sparkling sunlit gold with silver reflects
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (14%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (14%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Green rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
34
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Green rather than golden · 10-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in It's Glit, against Make Up For Ever Aqua Resist Smoky Eyeshadow Stick in 14 Solar. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14 SolarClosest shade matchIt's GlitHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%77#f0c683#e5c98fClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall55
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Bungalow, against Make Up For Ever Aqua Resist Smoky Eyeshadow Stick in 14 Solar. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14 SolarClosest overall alternativeBungalowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%72#f0c683#e8b77cClose colourColour difference 4.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%83LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared26
Longevity50%2024-hour wear8-hour wearDifferent8-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Overall match 76/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.