SurrealSkin Luminous Hydrating Foundation 11N dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.0 (3,150)·Medium · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$39Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (19%)4.3 (1,754)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: light medium, neutral to cool
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$39 less (81%)4.3 (644)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
67
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with cool rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: LIGHT TO MEDIUM WITH NEUTRAL UNDERTONES
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with neutral peach undertones
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light-deep shade, golden undertone
The closest shade to Makeup By Mario SurrealSkin Luminous Hydrating Foundation 11N (Medium · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Dior Forever Hydra Nude Foundation in 2.5N Neutral, against Makeup By Mario SurrealSkin Luminous Hydrating Foundation in 11N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11NClosest shade match2.5N NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#be9371#c0946fLooks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.6
Retailer descriptionLight mediumLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 91/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jung Saem Mool Essential Skin Nuder Long-Lasting Hydrating Compact Cushion Foundation in 30N Amber, against Makeup By Mario SurrealSkin Luminous Hydrating Foundation in 11N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11NClosest overall alternative30N AmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#be9371#c49673Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 2.0
Retailer descriptionLight mediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared85
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall33
Skin type100%33Normal, dry, combinationDryBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 93/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$16 less (33%)
