Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer 147.5 dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.2 (11,365)·Deep tan · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium deep with golden undertones
Matches: Claims 16-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Described as deep, yours as medium
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
68
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Described as deep, yours as medium · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish
Retailer shade note: deep with cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as medium
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Olive rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
20
Wear & performance
64
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: MD2.6 - Medium-deep with warm undertones, and an olive tone
The closest shade to Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer 147.5 (Deep tan · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
NARS Soft Matte Complete Concealer in Café, against Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer in 147.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade147.5Closest shade matchCaféHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%82#a85f30#9d5e3aClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared20
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%—not comparableNot listedMediumNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared64
Longevity30%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveNormal, combination, oilyMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 63/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Serum Concealer in 4N2, against Maybelline Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circle Treatment Concealer in 147.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade147.5Closest overall alternative4N2How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%80#a85f30#a06639Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 4 compared56
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%—not comparableNot listedMediumNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared59
Longevity30%40Not listed16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall68
Skin type100%68SensitiveDry, normal, combination, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 74/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $21.01 more
View at Walmart
