Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than mauve· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$1.99 less (22%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Silver rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Silver rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than mauve· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: baby pink with green gold shift
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: shimmering golden marshmallow
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: White rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Danessa Myricks Beauty Twin Flames Liquid Eyeshadow in Angel Heart, against Maybelline Shadow Drip Eye Tint Liquid Eye Shadow in Amethyst Drip. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmethyst DripClosest shade matchAngel HeartHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%92#ecdfe2#e5d8deVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 74/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Lab coat, against Maybelline Shadow Drip Eye Tint Liquid Eye Shadow in Amethyst Drip. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmethyst DripClosest overall alternativeLab coatHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%89#ecdfe2#f1e5e4Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 77/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.