Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$1.99 less (22%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: opalescent white w/pink, violet & blue duochrome effects
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than liquid (format)· 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: opalescent white with blue, pink, and purple pearl
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: liquid· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than white· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than white · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
26
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Same longevity: 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than white· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than white · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: white aurora (light coral glitter) , coral starlight (coral peach matte), Flaming Sunset (neutral peach brown matte)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Clear, against Maybelline Shadow Drip Eye Tint Liquid Eye Shadow in Silver Drip. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSilver DripClosest matchClearHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#f4f3f7#f1f1f1Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall73
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedDryNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.