Solo Shadow Cream Eyeshadow Palladium dupes and alternatives MERIT
3.9 (1,764)·Silver · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (4%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Peach rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Nude rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Brown rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than silver· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than silver · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: rose gold metallic with warm honey shimmer/
light champagne foil with gold & silver sparkle
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sheer silver with mutli-pearl glitter
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: White rather than silver· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: matte cream with subtle pink undertones
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than silver· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than silver · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Bisque, against MERIT Solo Shadow Cream Eyeshadow in Palladium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePalladiumClosest matchBisqueHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%98#d9b595#d9b593Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 87/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.