Solo Shadow Cream Eyeshadow Vachetta dupes and alternatives MERIT
3.9 (1,764)·Nude · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than nude· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than nude· Dewy rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than nude · Dewy rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel bronze / tan marble glow
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sparkling gold with multi-colored pearl
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: cream
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than nude· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than nude · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: cool-toned taupe with silver shimmer
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Copper rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
e.l.f. Cosmetics Liquid Velvet Eyeshadow in Extra Toasted, against MERIT Solo Shadow Cream Eyeshadow in Vachetta. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVachettaClosest shade matchExtra ToastedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%98#b1795c#b0795aLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 70/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Brown Sugar, against MERIT Solo Shadow Cream Eyeshadow in Vachetta. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVachettaClosest overall alternativeBrown SugarHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%84#b1795c#b6764fClose colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 85/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $8 more
