Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than purple · Holographic rather than shimmer (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than purple· Holographic rather than shimmer (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than purple · Holographic rather than shimmer (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Dior Addict Lip Maximizer Plumping Gloss in 003 Holographic Lavender, against Milk Makeup Odyssey Hydrating Lip Oil Gloss in Adventure. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAdventureClosest match003 Holographic LavenderHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall94
Colour55%89#d9b0ca#dcadcfVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Shine40%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shine level
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%75ShimmerHolographicSome differenceHolographic rather than shimmer
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Longevity100%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a non-sticky feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 84/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.