Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same shine: shimmer· Same shimmer: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than other
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than other · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than other· Pearl rather than shimmer (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than other · Pearl rather than shimmer (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than other· Holographic rather than shimmer (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than other · Holographic rather than shimmer (shimmer) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
25
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than other · Sparkle rather than shimmer (shimmer)
L.A. Girl Lumilicious Lip Gloss in Breathless, against Milk Makeup Odyssey Hydrating Lip Oil Gloss in Globetrot. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlobetrotClosest shade matchBreathlessHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall73
Colour55%89#cfd4d6#d1d1d1Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Depth 8LightCloseDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared78
Shine40%78ShimmerHigh shineCloseMore shine
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%—not comparableShimmerNot listedNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Longevity100%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 70/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Positive Light Luminizing Lip Gloss in Dazzle, against Milk Makeup Odyssey Hydrating Lip Oil Gloss in Globetrot. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlobetrotClosest overall alternativeDazzleHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall72
Colour55%74#cfd4d6#e1e6e5Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%79Depth 8Depth 0Some differenceDepth difference 7.7 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 76/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $3 more
