Shapelifter Micro Contour Stick Structured dupes and alternatives Morphe
4.6 (1,011)·Taupe · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: for medium tan – tan complexions
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: for dark – deep dark complexions
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than taupe · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Retailer shade note: fair to light with cool undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than taupe · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Retailer shade note: light-medium to tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for medium skin tones
Fenty Beauty Match Stix Contour Skinstick in Amber, against Morphe Shapelifter Micro Contour Stick in Structured. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStructuredClosest matchAmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour50%88#927f70#977e6aVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $15 more
