Shapelifter Micro Contour Stick Toned dupes and alternatives Morphe
4.6 (1,011)·Brown · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than brown· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than brown · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
Retailer shade note: light-medium to tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (possible)
Retailer shade note: neutral/olive undertone, natural finish for tan skin tones
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light-medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
KimChi Chic Beauty Thailor Contour Duo in 02 Mocha, against Morphe Shapelifter Micro Contour Stick in Toned. Matched on the contour pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTonedClosest match02 MochaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour50%96#9c7a5e#9f7d61Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared65
Finish60%—not comparableNaturalNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format20%—not comparableStickNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 90/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $20 more
