Afterglow Lipstick Ever After dupes and alternatives NARS
4.1 (1,026)·Nude · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than nude· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than nude · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than nude· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than nude · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a warm nude baby pink for iconic lips in just one swipe
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light peachy nude with a satin finish
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Overall match 83/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.