Afterglow Lipstick First Move dupes and alternatives NARS
4.1 (1,026)·Pink · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a warm nude baby pink for iconic lips in just one swipe
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than pink · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$12Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (67%)4.2 (810)
Matches: Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Tinted Lip Oil Stain in Hope, against NARS Afterglow Lipstick in First Move. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFirst MoveClosest matchHopeHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%94#de8e97#e38a95Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 92/100Shade match 87/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$14 less (39%)
