Explicit Lipstick Adulterous – 828 dupes and alternatives NARS
4.6 (859)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: satin· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (36%)4.7 (677)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than pink· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: For a rustic rose finish look use
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Overall match 86/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Anastasia Beverly Hills Full-Pigment Matte & Satin Velvet Lipstick in Hush Pink, against NARS Explicit Lipstick in Adulterous – 828. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAdulterous – 828Closest overall alternativeHush PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%92#d07f7c#d68583Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall88
Finish55%78SatinMatteCloseMatte finish rather than satin
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall76
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 89/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.