Explicit Lipstick SEDITIOUS - 887 dupes and alternatives NARS
4.6 (859)·Rose · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: satin· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (31%)3.7 (883)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Valentino Spike Valentino Buttery Matte Lipstick in Love At First Spike, against NARS Explicit Lipstick in SEDITIOUS - 887. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSEDITIOUS - 887Closest shade matchLove At First SpikeHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall91
Colour60%87#944e56#8b474eVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 4.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall56
Finish55%78SatinMatteCloseMatte finish rather than satin
Opacity45%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%70Long-wearing10-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 10-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 78/100Shade match 91/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Super Lustrous Ultra Lipstick in Rosewood, against NARS Explicit Lipstick in SEDITIOUS - 887. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSEDITIOUS - 887Closest overall alternativeRosewoodHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%88#944e56#924c4eVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60CoolNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family13%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableSatinNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 92/100Shade match 87/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $7 more
Walmart
