Hy-Glam Foundation Hydrating & Blurring Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation RP6 dupes and alternatives Natasha Denona
4.5 (2,944)·Medium light · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Luminous · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: tan skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: tan skin with warm neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
35
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral golden undertones
The closest shade to Natasha Denona Hy-Glam Foundation Hydrating & Blurring Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation RP6 (Medium light · Cool · rosy undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tarte Face Tape Full Coverage Foundation in 37N Medium-Tan Neutral, against Natasha Denona Hy-Glam Foundation Hydrating & Blurring Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation in RP6. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRP6Closest shade match37N Medium-Tan NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#e5a078#dca07bVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared47
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%7018-hour wear12-hour wearSome difference12-hour wear claimed against 18-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Normal, dry, sensitiveNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 75/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
L.A. Girl Pro Coverage Liquid Foundation in Porcelain, against Natasha Denona Hy-Glam Foundation Hydrating & Blurring Luminous Longwear Serum Foundation in RP6. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRP6Closest overall alternativePorcelainHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%95#e5a078#e5a57fLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 81/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $29 more
Target
