Hy-Sculpt Liquid Bronzer Bamboo dupes and alternatives Natasha Denona
4.5 (786)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light to light-medium with a golden undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light-medium to medium with a neutral
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: fair to light with neutral-warm undertones
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Light with neutral undertones
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: medium with warm bronzer and cool contour
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warms medium to medium dark skin tones
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warms light medium to medium skin tones
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: for medium to deep complexions
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: Light tan with cool undertones
Summer Fridays Bronzer Butter Balm Sculpting Cream Bronzer with Ceramides in Dune, against Natasha Denona Hy-Sculpt Liquid Bronzer in Bamboo. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBambooClosest matchDuneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%92#ba8775#b68772Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall81
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared73
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Overall match 86/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.