Hy-Sculpt Liquid Bronzer Foxy dupes and alternatives Natasha Denona
4.5 (786)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium to tan with a neutral golden undertone
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for medium skin tones
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light-medium to medium with a neutral
Matches: Very close colour· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim waterproof· Both claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: contour for light to medium skin
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: for medium to deep complexions
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: liquid· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: natural skin-like finish for medium-dark skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: tan to deep with warm undertones
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
44
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: light-medium with neutral undertones
Huda Beauty Bronze Filter Bronzer and Contour Palette in Medium, against Natasha Denona Hy-Sculpt Liquid Bronzer in Foxy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFoxyClosest shade matchMediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%94#b0715e#ad6f59Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98LightMediumCloseDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared43
Finish50%—not comparableNaturalNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared53
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 72/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Warm Wishes Effortless Bronzer Stick in Always Sunny, against Natasha Denona Hy-Sculpt Liquid Bronzer in Foxy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFoxyClosest overall alternativeAlways SunnyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour55%65#b0715e#b66f4bSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100LightDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall73
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Format25%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 81/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $6 more
