Hy-Sculpt Liquid Bronzer Fling dupes and alternatives Natasha Denona
4.5 (786)·Rose · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim waterproof· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than rose· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than rose · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (possible)
Retailer shade note: contour for deep to very deep skin
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as blush, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich berry / deep with warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: liquid· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than rose · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: liquid· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than rose
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than rose · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than rose
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than rose · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Balm rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as blush, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than rose · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: deep skin tones, neutral undertones
DIBS Beauty Desert Island Duo Blush + Bronzer Stick in Shade 6 - Plot Twist / Level Up, against Natasha Denona Hy-Sculpt Liquid Bronzer in Fling. Matched on the Level Up pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Overall match 72/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour in 11 Rich, against Natasha Denona Hy-Sculpt Liquid Bronzer in Fling. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFlingClosest overall alternative11 RichHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour55%48#431b17#3a2326Slight colour differenceColour difference 7.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 80/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.