Magnetic Matte Eye Color Putty dupes and alternatives Nudestix
4.4 (717)·Nude · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (69%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Deeper· Taupe rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Taupe rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Grey rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Grey rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: rose gold metallic with warm honey shimmer/
light champagne foil with gold & silver sparkle
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: Earthy Glam (taupe beige glitter), Wood Breeze (olive beige brown shimmer), Night Haze (deep khaki brown matte)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Champagne Showers, against Nudestix Magnetic Matte Eye Color in Putty. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePuttyClosest shade matchChampagne ShowersHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%90#d1aa92#caa490Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared7
Finish65%0MatteGlitterDifferentGlitter finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%7011-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 11-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableOilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 62/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Violette_Fr YEUX PAINT Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in Petite Culotte, against Nudestix Magnetic Matte Eye Color in Putty. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePuttyClosest overall alternativePetite CulotteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#d1aa92#d9ad99Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7011-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 11-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableOilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (41%)
