Magnetic Matte Eye Color Taupe dupes and alternatives Nudestix
4.4 (717)·Brown · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than brown· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than brown · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than oily (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than brown· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: cool-toned taupe with silver shimmer
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (79%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 11-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than oily (skin types)
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Strawberry Fudge, against Nudestix Magnetic Matte Eye Color in Taupe. Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTaupeClosest shade matchStrawberry FudgeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%85#987461#a17665Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared23
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7011-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 11-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared0
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0OilySensitiveDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 62/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Shadowstix Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Amber, against Nudestix Magnetic Matte Eye Color in Taupe. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTaupeClosest overall alternativeAmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%73#987461#a67d63Close colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%86MediumLightCloseDepth difference 5.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall67
Longevity50%7011-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 11-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableOilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 82/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.