Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
96
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Other rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Other rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Terracotta rather than rose· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than rose · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Gel rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Gel rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown / nude rather than rose· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown / nude rather than rose · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush 24H Buildable Powder Blush in 38 Velvet Latte, against R.E.M. Beauty Eclipse Cheek & Lip Stick in audition. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeauditionClosest shade match38 Velvet LatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour55%93#ac625f#b16162Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 79/100Shade match 90/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Nudestix NUDIES MATTE All Over Face Blush Color in Sweet Cheeks, against R.E.M. Beauty Eclipse Cheek & Lip Stick in audition. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeauditionClosest overall alternativeSweet CheeksHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour55%74#ac625f#bf5b5dClose colourColour difference 4.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 84/100Shade match 79/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.