Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Berry rather than plum · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than plum · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Berry rather than plum · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Berry rather than plum · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: rich berry / deep with warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than plum · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than plum· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than plum · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Berry rather than plum · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than plum· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than plum · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than plum · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown / nude rather than plum· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown / nude rather than plum · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than plum · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown / nude rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown / nude rather than plum · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Visibly different colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Berry rather than plum · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than plum· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than plum · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Berry rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone· Terracotta rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Terracotta rather than plum · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than plum · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Lighter· Brown / nude rather than plum· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown / nude rather than plum · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown / nude rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown / nude rather than plum · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than plum · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Berry rather than plum · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Berry rather than plum · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Too Faced Chocolate Soleil Matte Blurring Bronzer in Chocolate Ganache, against R.E.M. Beauty Eclipse Cheek & Lip Stick in Cab-eret. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCab-eretClosest matchChocolate GanacheHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour55%89#5c2d24#592d1fVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
