Eclipse Cheek & Lip Stick Off Book dupes and alternatives R.E.M. Beauty
4.5 (790)·Mauve · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown / nude rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown / nude rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Looks identical · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Plum rather than mauve· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Plum rather than mauve · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Berry rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Berry rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Berry rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown / nude rather than mauve· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown / nude rather than mauve · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 62% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Gel rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Gel rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: dirty cool mauve with pink pearl
ColourPop Hydrating Blush Stix in Dream State, against R.E.M. Beauty Eclipse Cheek & Lip Stick in Off Book. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOff BookClosest shade matchDream StateHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%96#9c4857#9c4354Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall63
Finish50%25MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Overall match 80/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Valentino Liquirosso 2 in 1 Soft Matte Liquid Lipstick & Blush in 310R - Pink Hour, against R.E.M. Beauty Eclipse Cheek & Lip Stick in Off Book. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOff BookClosest overall alternative310R - Pink HourHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%90#9c4857#a54255Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $1 more
