Starlet Matte Liquid Eyeshadow BRB dupes and alternatives R.E.M. Beauty
4.1 (191)·Mauve · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than mauve· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Nude rather than mauve· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Copper rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than mauve· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than mauve · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Copper rather than mauve· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than mauve · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
e.l.f. Cosmetics Bite Size Eyeshadow Palette in Take Your Pink, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Matte Liquid Eyeshadow in BRB. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBRBClosest shade matchTake Your PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#ca7e71#c27a6dVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared8
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 64/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Glimmer Eyeshadow Multi-Stick in Swipe Right, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Matte Liquid Eyeshadow in BRB. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBRBClosest overall alternativeSwipe RightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%82#ca7e71#bb7e74Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 85/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $3 more
