Starlet Matte Liquid Eyeshadow NVM dupes and alternatives R.E.M. Beauty
4.1 (191)·Brown · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Terracotta rather than brown· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Terracotta rather than brown · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than brown· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Golden rather than brown· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than brown· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Golden rather than brown· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than brown· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than brown· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than brown· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than brown · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
15
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Revlon ColorStay Crème Eyeshadow in Caramel, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Matte Liquid Eyeshadow in NVM. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNVMClosest shade matchCaramelHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%78#d89c77#c8997dClose colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared28
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall67
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 64/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Caramel, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Matte Liquid Eyeshadow in NVM. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNVMClosest overall alternativeCaramelHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%75#d89c77#c8967cClose colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightLightSameDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $17 more
