Starlet Matte Liquid Eyeshadow ILY dupes and alternatives R.E.M. Beauty
4.1 (191)·Brown · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$10.01 less (46%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in It's Fabstract, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Matte Liquid Eyeshadow in ILY. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeILYClosest shade matchIt's FabstractHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#693f2d#683f2bLooks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared15
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 69/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Glimmer Eyeshadow Multi-Stick in Main Character, against R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Matte Liquid Eyeshadow in ILY. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeILYClosest overall alternativeMain CharacterHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#693f2d#6c422dVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 95/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.