Soft Pinch Liquid Blush Forever dupes and alternatives Rare Beauty
4.7 (16,236)·Brown / nude · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Balm rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Balm rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude· Balm rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown / nude · Balm rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy
Differences: Pink rather than brown / nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than brown / nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than brown / nude· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft rose beige (dream blur matte)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown / nude· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown / nude · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than brown / nude· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
36
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Patrick Ta Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo in Not Too Much, against Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Blush in Forever. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeForeverClosest shade matchNot Too MuchHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%91#ca847c#d08b81Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100Brown / nudeBrown / nudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared65
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 81/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush Longwear Natural Glow Cream Blush in 23 Hot Mauve, against Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Blush in Forever. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeForeverClosest overall alternative23 Hot MauveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%88#ca847c#cd8d84Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100Brown / nudeBrown / nudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall79
Finish50%78DewySatinCloseSatin finish rather than dewy
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, Combination, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $10 more
