Soft Pinch Liquid Blush Grace dupes and alternatives Rare Beauty
4.7 (16,236)·Mauve · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
36
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 40% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
DIBS Beauty Duet Baked Blush Duo in VIP Pink, against Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Blush in Grace. Matched on the deeper blush pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGraceClosest shade matchVIP PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%96#cd5a7b#cc5a7fLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 74/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush 12H Blurring Liquid Blush in 3 Mischievous Magenta, against Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Blush in Grace. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGraceClosest overall alternative3 Mischievous MagentaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%93#cd5a7b#cc5277Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, Combination, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 92/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $15 more
