ReEvolve Natural Finish Foundation 122 dupes and alternatives RMS Beauty
4.5 (1,349)·Very deep · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (41%)4.5 (732)
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: rich with warm red undertones
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (41%)4.5 (732)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
The closest shade to RMS Beauty ReEvolve Natural Finish Foundation 122 (Very deep · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte Foundation in 113 Brown Suede, against RMS Beauty ReEvolve Natural Finish Foundation in 122. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade122Closest shade match113 Brown SuedeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#70472c#754728Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 77/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Maracuja Juicy Glow Tint in 57S Rich Sand, against RMS Beauty ReEvolve Natural Finish Foundation in 122. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade122Closest overall alternative57S Rich SandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%94#70472c#6c462fVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Walmart
Ulta Beauty$10 less (17%)
Sephora
