Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a medium bronze shade fused with Luminous Light for a softer, candlelit warmth. (Ideal for light/medium complexions)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
71
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for light skin tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: cream
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
47
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-medium bronze with warm undertones
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Does not claim hydration· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warms light to light medium skin tones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: cream· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light to light-medium with a golden undertone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Does not claim hydration· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warms medium to medium dark skin tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light bronze with neutral undertones
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: for medium to deep complexions
CoverGirl TruBlend Sun & Sculpt Bronzing Glow Serum in Very Light, against Saie Dew Bronze Soft-Focus Sculpting Liquid Bronzer in Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSandClosest shade matchVery LightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall100
Colour55%100#bf8c6d#bf8c6dLooks identicalColour difference 0.0 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall65
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%60CreamLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 83/100Shade match 100/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Physicians Formula Butter Bronzer Murumuru Butter Bronzer in Light Bronzer, against Saie Dew Bronze Soft-Focus Sculpting Liquid Bronzer in Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSandClosest overall alternativeLight BronzerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour55%82#bf8c6d#cd936eClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth25%90LightLightSameDepth difference 4.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 84/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $6 more
