Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: medium bronze with warm undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
71
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for medium skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: natural skin-like finish for medium-dark skin tones
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: light-medium to medium with a neutral
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
47
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: light-medium with neutral undertones
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: medium with warm bronzer and cool contour
Differences: Lighter· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warms medium to medium dark skin tones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: cream
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than golden· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
47
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than golden · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light/medium bronze with neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: sheer· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: a cool bronze shade fused with Diffused Light to mimic a ray of warm sunlight. (Ideal for light/medium complexions)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warms light medium to medium skin tones
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Medium to tan with warm golden undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: for light to medium complexions
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
71
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than golden · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, combination, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: neutral/olive undertone, natural finish for tan skin tones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: for medium to deep complexions
Givenchy Prisme Libre 4-Color Blurring & Sculpting Bronzer Powder in 001- Mousseline Bronzée, against Saie Dew Bronze Soft-Focus Sculpting Liquid Bronzer in Spritz. Matched on pan 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSpritzClosest shade match001- Mousseline BronzéeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%90#9c7860#967764Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98LightMediumCloseDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall64
Finish50%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 78/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
DIBS Beauty Desert Island Duo Blush + Bronzer Stick in Shade 1.5 - Bloom Service / Bronze Voyage, against Saie Dew Bronze Soft-Focus Sculpting Liquid Bronzer in Spritz. Matched on the Bronze Voyage pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSpritzClosest overall alternativeShade 1.5 - Bloom Service / Bronze VoyageHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour55%83#9c7860#a87e65Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth25%91LightLightSameDepth difference 4.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 79/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $2 more
