Reveal The Real 12HR Soft Radiant Skin Tint 170 O dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
4.2 (488)·Light medium · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Same light coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral olive tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same olive undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: light with medium warm undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim colour stability· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: Light medium with subtle pink undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim colour stability· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim colour stability· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertone
$20.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$3.01 less (13%)4.3 (8,122)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: fair skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: fair medium with cool pink undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
39
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
The closest shade to Sephora Collection Reveal The Real 12HR Soft Radiant Skin Tint 170 O (Light medium · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Medium Coverage Foundation in 190 Light, against Sephora Collection Reveal The Real 12HR Soft Radiant Skin Tint in 170 O. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade170 OClosest shade match190 LightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%96#d5b092#d8af90Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%60LightMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than light
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared63
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, sensitiveBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rabanne Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation in 20W, against Sephora Collection Reveal The Real 12HR Soft Radiant Skin Tint in 170 O. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade170 OClosest overall alternative20WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%97#d5b092#d9b395Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $18 more
