Reveal The Real 12HR Soft Radiant Skin Tint 290 N dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
4.2 (488)·Deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral undertone for very rich skin
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: deep cocoa with rich undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with rosy undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: dark deep espresso with rich undertone for deep dark skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
33
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: dark deep rich brown with red undertones for deep dark skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same light coverage· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: intense dark-deep shade, red undertone
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: Extra deep with cool undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
67
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: richest with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
33
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: dark deep espresso with rich undertones for deep dark skin
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same light coverage· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: dark-deep shade, red undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Sephora Collection Reveal The Real 12HR Soft Radiant Skin Tint 290 N (Deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Essence Foundation Stick in 290, against Sephora Collection Reveal The Real 12HR Soft Radiant Skin Tint in 290 N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade290 NClosest shade match290How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#704b43#754d46Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.8
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 74/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Well People Skinforia Serum Foundation in 46 Rich Neutral, against Sephora Collection Reveal The Real 12HR Soft Radiant Skin Tint in 290 N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade290 NClosest overall alternative46 Rich NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#704b43#71493dVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99DeepVery deepCloseDepth difference: 0.7
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 84/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $18 more
Walmart
Sephora
