Reveal The Real 12HR Soft Radiant Skin Tint 260 Y dupes and alternatives Sephora Collection
4.2 (488)·Medium · Warm · yellow undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (33%)4.0 (94)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: tan-dark neutral skin with peach undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.01 less (21%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
24
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.01 less (21%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (46%)4.4 (41,209)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
24
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· No drying alcohol listed· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
33
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Colour not compared · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium with warm undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Described as tan, yours as deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
81
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as tan, yours as deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: tan neutral
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as tan, yours as deep
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Described as tan, yours as deep· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
81
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as tan, yours as deep · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: tan cool
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as tan, yours as deep
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Described as tan, yours as deep· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as tan, yours as deep · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: tan skin with warm, peach undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as tan, yours as deep
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium with golden neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
The closest shade to Sephora Collection Reveal The Real 12HR Soft Radiant Skin Tint 260 Y (Medium · Warm · yellow undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris Infallible Skin Ink 2-in-1 Foundation Concealer in 270 Medium Warm, against Sephora Collection Reveal The Real 12HR Soft Radiant Skin Tint in 260 Y. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade260 YClosest shade match270 Medium WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#cb946a#cf976dLooks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 1.7
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 80/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rabanne Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation in 70W, against Sephora Collection Reveal The Real 12HR Soft Radiant Skin Tint in 260 Y. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade260 YClosest overall alternative70WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#cb946a#c68f61Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 2.8
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 89/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.