Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer 61G espresso golden dupes and alternatives Tarte
4.5 (38,566)·Rich deep · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral rich-brown undertones
$30Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (6%)4.7 (491)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: very deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with cool brown undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: rich deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with rich neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium-full rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
30
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer 61G espresso golden (Rich deep · Olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix 36HR Smooth Angles Hydrating Concealer in NC63, against Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 61G espresso golden. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade61G espresso goldenClosest shade matchNC63How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%96#57321f#57311bLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 90/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Soft Matte Complete Concealer in Dark Coffee, against Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 61G espresso golden. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade61G espresso goldenClosest overall alternativeDark CoffeeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%87#57321f#5c3a29Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared93
Finish35%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared88
Longevity30%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, combination, oilyNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Overall match 87/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
