Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer 62H espresso honey dupes and alternatives Tarte
4.5 (38,566)·Rich deep · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· No fragrance listed
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with rich neutral undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral rich-brown undertones
Matches: Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: rich deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
33
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with neutral cool undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with golden undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.01 less (59%)4.3 (3,814)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer 62H espresso honey (Rich deep · Warm · peach undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer in 17.75 Deep, against Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 62H espresso honey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade62H espresso honeyClosest shade match17.75 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%89#522c24#552c1fVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall30
Skin type100%30Normal, combination, oilyDry, normalBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 69/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer in 16.5 Deep, against Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 62H espresso honey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade62H espresso honeyClosest overall alternative16.5 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%62#522c24#4f3221Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.0 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared66
Longevity30%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, combination, oilyNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/oily skin
Overall match 78/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $4 more
View at Walmart
