Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation 8N Joshua Tree dupes and alternatives Tower 28 Beauty
4.0 (441)·Light · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: M3.75 - Medium to medium-deep with neutral undertones, and an olive tone
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium neutral with olive undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
The closest shade to Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation 8N Joshua Tree (Light · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation in 5 Neutral, against Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation in 8N Joshua Tree. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade8N Joshua TreeClosest shade match5 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%86#d8b98b#e5c495Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%85LightLightSameDepth difference: 5.9
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared59
Longevity30%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall68
Skin type100%68SensitiveCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 73/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Youngblood Loose Mineral Foundation in Warm Beige, against Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation in 8N Joshua Tree. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade8N Joshua TreeClosest overall alternativeWarm BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%83#d8b98b#e7c28dClose colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87LightLightSameDepth difference: 5.3
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 4 compared100
Finish35%—not comparableRadiantNot listedNot comparedFinish not listed for one product
Coverage30%100MediumBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100SensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (61%)
