Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
Retailer shade note: soft cool pink with subtle shimmer
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Satin rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown / nude rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown / nude rather than mauve · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Behave - 900, against Ulta Beauty Collection Velvet Veil Minerals Powder Blush in Snapdragon. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSnapdragonClosest matchBehave - 900How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%92#e29f9e#db9a96Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Overall match 86/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $26 more
Sephora
