Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Pink rather than plum· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than plum · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than plum· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than plum · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than plum· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than plum · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Pink rather than plum· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than plum · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than plum· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than plum · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Rose rather than plum· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than plum · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: deep burnt rose (dream blur matte)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Pink rather than plum· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than plum · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Coral rather than plum· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Coral rather than plum · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm coral with golden shimmer
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than plum· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than plum · Cream rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush 24H Buildable Powder Blush in 54 Berry Bang, against Ulta Beauty Collection Velvet Veil Minerals Powder Blush in Southern Sunset. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSouthern SunsetClosest shade match54 Berry BangHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%86#d47686#da6e7cVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 71/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Baked Blush in Berry Amore, against Ulta Beauty Collection Velvet Veil Minerals Powder Blush in Southern Sunset. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSouthern SunsetClosest overall alternativeBerry AmoreHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour55%79#d47686#cf6f77Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 77/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.