Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than brown / nude· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than brown / nude
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than brown / nude · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm romantic nude (swish and pop glow)
Matches: Same format: powder· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than brown / nude · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than brown / nude · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than brown / nude
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than brown / nude · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: peachy pink with golden shimmer
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Coral rather than brown / nude
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Coral rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than brown / nude · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Coral rather than brown / nude
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Coral rather than brown / nude · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than brown / nude
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Retailer shade note: cool pink bronze for fair-medium skin tones
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than brown / nude
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than brown / nude · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than brown / nude · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
RMS Beauty ReDimension Hydra Powder Blush in Crystal Slipper, against Ulta Beauty Collection Velvet Veil Minerals Powder Blush in Tiger Lily. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTiger LilyClosest shade matchCrystal SlipperHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%92#f2c1a9#f4c4b1Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumLightCloseDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100Brown / nudeBrown / nudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall81
Finish50%80ShimmerDewyCloseDewy finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 79/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
bareMinerals GEN NUDE Highlighting Blush in Peach Glow, against Ulta Beauty Collection Velvet Veil Minerals Powder Blush in Tiger Lily. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTiger LilyClosest overall alternativePeach GlowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour55%94#f2c1a9#f3c5abVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumLightCloseDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 81/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $21 more
