Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (62%)4.3 (23,361)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (7%)4.7 (988)
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than berry· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than berry · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Red rather than berry· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Red rather than berry · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Plum rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Plum rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: buildable· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Red rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Red rather than berry · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (7%)4.7 (988)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than berry· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than berry · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Red rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Red rather than berry · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (14%)4.6 (2,639)
Matches: Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in It's Yours, against Violette_Fr LIP NECTAR Hydrating Lip Stain in Amarante Noire. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmarante NoireClosest shade matchIt's YoursHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall88
Colour60%82#690817#76001fClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared65
Finish55%—not comparableNot listedGlossyNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Wear & performance15% of overall76
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 81/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Power Mauve, against Violette_Fr LIP NECTAR Hydrating Lip Stain in Amarante Noire. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmarante NoireClosest overall alternativePower MauveHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall80
Colour60%88#690817#6f091fVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 86/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.