LIP NECTAR Hydrating Lip Stain Bêtise dupes and alternatives Violette_Fr
4.3 (694)·Berry · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than berry· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than berry · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (14%)4.6 (2,639)
Matches: Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (62%)4.3 (23,361)
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than berry· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than berry · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a showstopping cool candy apple red to add pizzazz to your pout
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than berry · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than berry· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than berry · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.01 less (52%)4.5 (10,199)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than berry· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than berry · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (62%)4.3 (23,361)
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (3%)4.4 (4,830)
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Glossy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Ulta Beauty Collection Luxe Satin Lipstick in Red Flag 321, against Violette_Fr LIP NECTAR Hydrating Lip Stain in Bêtise. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBêtiseClosest shade matchRed Flag 321How they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall85
Colour60%93#961136#990030Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%15WarmCoolDifferentCool against warm
Colour family13%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared65
Finish55%—not comparableNot listedSatinNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 75/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Berry Queen, against Violette_Fr LIP NECTAR Hydrating Lip Stain in Bêtise. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBêtiseClosest overall alternativeBerry QueenHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall71
Colour60%81#961136#9f1c44Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 81/100Shade match 71/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.