Bio Powder Foundation 9W dupes and alternatives Well People
4.2 (130)·Medium tan · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/dry skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with golden olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural matte rather than matte finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
49
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural matte rather than matte finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: rich tan with golden olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$0.61 less (3%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims 32-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
49
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
34
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
25
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Described as very fair, yours as rich deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as very fair, yours as rich deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage
Retailer shade note: very fair skin neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as very fair, yours as rich deep
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Well People Bio Powder Foundation 9W (Medium tan · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Golden 4, against Well People Bio Powder Foundation in 9W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade9WClosest shade matchGolden 4How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#bf844f#c0864fLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 82/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique Acne Solutions Liquid Makeup Foundation in WN 100 Deep Honey, against Well People Bio Powder Foundation in 9W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade9WClosest overall alternativeWN 100 Deep HoneyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#bf844f#c9874fVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 85/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.